Eswatini vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.1367 standard error against 0.1338 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0029 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.
Eswatini ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.3052 standard error | 0.0072 standard error | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.1861 standard error | 0.1691 standard error | 0.0171 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1341 standard error | 0.1369 standard error | 0.0029 standard error | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.1367 standard error against 0.1338 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 0.0029 standard error, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Eswatini ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.