Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Central African Republic
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.1338 standard error against 0.1336 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0002 standard error.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 53 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.298 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1768 standard error | 0.1861 standard error | 0.0093 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1334 standard error | 0.1341 standard error | 0.0007 standard error | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.1338 standard error against 0.1336 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 0.0002 standard error, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.