Voice and Accountability in Guinea
Guinea: Voice and Accountability was 0.1361 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Guinea, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Guinea recorded 0.1361 standard error for voice and accountability in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 41.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Guinea peaked at 0.2606 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1361 standard error, in 2011.
Guinea ranks 14th of 53 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Guinea, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2441 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2606 standard error | +6.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2323 standard error | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 0.1761 standard error | -24.2% |
| 2003 | 0.1736 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1858 standard error | +7.1% |
| 2005 | 0.1778 standard error | -4.3% |
| 2006 | 0.1388 standard error | -21.9% |
| 2007 | 0.1382 standard error | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 0.138 standard error | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 0.1401 standard error | +1.5% |
| 2010 | 0.1366 standard error | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 0.1361 standard error | -0.4% |
Guinea compared with similar countries
- Guinea's 0.1361 standard error is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1161 standard error, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Guinea's 0.1361 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2523 standard error | 0.2441 standard error | 0.2606 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1667 standard error | 0.138 standard error | 0.2323 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1363 standard error | 0.1361 standard error | 0.1366 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Guinea
More reference data data for Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2883 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3722 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2242 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.57 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Guinea?
- Voice and accountability in Guinea was 0.1361 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2606 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1361 standard error in 2011.
- How does Guinea rank for voice and accountability?
- Guinea ranks 14th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.