Voice and Accountability in Mauritius
Mauritius: Voice and Accountability was 0.1367 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Mauritius, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability in Mauritius is 0.1367 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and down 46.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Mauritius peaked at 0.3176 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1367 standard error, in 2011.
Mauritius ranks 13th of 53 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.3176 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2927 standard error | -7.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2554 standard error | -12.7% |
| 2002 | 0.202 standard error | -20.9% |
| 2003 | 0.1654 standard error | -18.1% |
| 2004 | 0.1707 standard error | +3.2% |
| 2005 | 0.1718 standard error | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.1375 standard error | -19.9% |
| 2007 | 0.1395 standard error | +1.4% |
| 2008 | 0.1387 standard error | -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.1404 standard error | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1372 standard error | -2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.1367 standard error | -0.4% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 0.1367 standard error is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1309 standard error, 1.0× the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 0.1367 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3052 standard error | 0.2927 standard error | 0.3176 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1691 standard error | 0.1375 standard error | 0.2554 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1369 standard error | 0.1367 standard error | 0.1372 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Mauritius?
- Voice and accountability in Mauritius was 0.1367 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3176 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1367 standard error in 2011.
- How does Mauritius rank for voice and accountability?
- Mauritius ranks 13th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.