Colombia vs Malawi: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Colombia
0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malawi
-0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Colombia rank
103rd
Malawi rank
106th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Colombia
  • Malawi
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102025

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Colombia's figure about 4.9 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.

Colombia ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 106th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s -0.536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2000s -0.3053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia
2010s 0.022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia
2020s 0.0895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Colombia or Malawi?
Colombia, at 0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Colombia and Malawi?
0.0513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Malawi?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Malawi rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Colombia ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 106th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Malawi: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/malawi/">Colombia vs Malawi: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.