Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Malawi
-0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Sri Lanka
0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malawi rank
106th
Sri Lanka rank
105th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Malawi
  • Sri Lanka
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 105th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2000s -0.3262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0561 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sri Lanka
2010s -0.1408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3917 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2020s -0.0059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Malawi or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Malawi and Sri Lanka?
0.0165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sri Lanka?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Sri Lanka rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Malawi ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 105th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/sri-lanka/">Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.