Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Kazakhstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kazakhstan is -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.3% on the previous year and down 10.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kazakhstan peaked at -0.7064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008 and was at its lowest, -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.9799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.2% |
| 2000 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.9% |
| 2002 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.8% |
| 2003 | -0.9882 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2004 | -0.9938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2005 | -0.9149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2006 | -0.9062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
| 2007 | -0.8346 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2008 | -0.7064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.4% |
| 2009 | -0.7481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.9% |
| 2010 | -0.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.9% |
| 2011 | -0.8102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2012 | -0.905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.7% |
| 2013 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.6% |
| 2014 | -0.9457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2015 | -0.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.0% |
| 2016 | -0.906 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2017 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.5% |
| 2018 | -0.8848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.6% |
| 2019 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.0% |
| 2020 | -0.9802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2021 | -0.9565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2022 | -0.9748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2023 | -0.9595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2024 | -0.9143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2025 | -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 17.8× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.9206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.9177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kazakhstan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kazakhstan was -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.7064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 153rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.