Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Angola
Angola: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Angola, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Angola recorded -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.3% on the previous year and up 10.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Angola peaked at -0.8095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Angola 154th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Angola, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.7% |
| 2000 | -1.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2002 | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.7% |
| 2003 | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2004 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2005 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.2% |
| 2006 | -1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2007 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2008 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2009 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2011 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2012 | -0.9965 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2013 | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2014 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.7% |
| 2015 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2016 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2017 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2018 | -0.8709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.5% |
| 2019 | -0.8095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.0% |
| 2020 | -0.8324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2021 | -0.908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2022 | -0.9702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2024 | -0.9778 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2025 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Angola's -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.9391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Angola
More reference data data for Angola
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.163 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 20.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8877 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Angola?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Angola was -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was -0.8095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Angola rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Angola ranks 154th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.