Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kazakhstan
-0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania
-0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
153rd
Mauritania rank
150th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Mauritania ranks 150th of 208 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.9206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0896 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.9177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2020s -0.958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at -0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
0.0611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Mauritania ranks 150th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/mauritania/">Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.