Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Kazakhstan
-0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritania
-0.9253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
147th
Mauritania rank
150th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports -0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.1096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.9124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.8627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan
2020s -0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Kazakhstan, at -0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
0.1096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/mauritania/">Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.