Bhutan vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Bhutan
0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Suriname
0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Bhutan rank
91st
Suriname rank
88th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Suriname
-1-0.500.5199620102025

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Suriname ahead.

Bhutan ranks 91st and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname
2000s -0.7875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname
2010s 0.0593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname
2020s 0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bhutan or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bhutan and Suriname?
0.0265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bhutan ranks 91st and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/suriname/">Bhutan vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.