Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Belarus
Belarus: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Belarus, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus stood at -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 2.1% on the previous year and down 42.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus peaked at -0.8266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998 and was at its lowest, -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2023.
That places Belarus 194th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 756.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 21.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,429 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1,107 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 518.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 3.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 5,669 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0133 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 487.54 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus was -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was -0.8266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- How does Belarus rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 194th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.