Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belarus
Belarus: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Belarus, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus stood at -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and down 42.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus peaked at -0.874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998 and was at its lowest, -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2023.
That places Belarus 196th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.9467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.7% |
| 2000 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +63.2% |
| 2002 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.8% |
| 2003 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.3% |
| 2004 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2005 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.7% |
| 2006 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2007 | -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2008 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.4% |
| 2009 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2010 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2011 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2012 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2013 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2014 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.2% |
| 2015 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2016 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.7% |
| 2017 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.4% |
| 2018 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2019 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.9% |
| 2020 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.5% |
| 2021 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.6% |
| 2022 | -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2023 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2024 | -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2025 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 32.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -63.2% | -0.874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Belarus was -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was -0.874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- How does Belarus rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 196th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.