Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Belarus
-1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Tajikistan
-1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Belarus rank
196th
Tajikistan rank
199th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Belarus
  • Tajikistan
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8199620102025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 196th and Tajikistan ranks 199th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2000s -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tajikistan
2010s -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2020s -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Belarus or Tajikistan?
Belarus, at -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Belarus and Tajikistan?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tajikistan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Tajikistan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Belarus ranks 196th and Tajikistan ranks 199th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/tajikistan/">Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.