Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Belarus
-1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tajikistan
-1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Belarus rank
194th
Tajikistan rank
191st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Belarus
  • Tajikistan
-2-1.8-1.5-1.2-1-0.75199620102024

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belarus, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 194th and Tajikistan ranks 191st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.965 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2000s -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tajikistan
2010s -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2020s -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Belarus or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Belarus and Tajikistan?
0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tajikistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Tajikistan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Belarus ranks 194th and Tajikistan ranks 191st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/tajikistan/">Belarus vs Tajikistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.