Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cambodia
Cambodia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Cambodia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cambodia stood at -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.
The figure is down 1.3% on the previous year and down 42.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cambodia peaked at -0.8568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2025.
Cambodia ranks 193rd of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cambodia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2000 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2002 | -0.9518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.6% |
| 2003 | -0.9011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2004 | -0.9123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2005 | -0.926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2006 | -0.8568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2007 | -0.8667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2008 | -0.8678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2009 | -0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2010 | -0.9495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.0% |
| 2011 | -0.9815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2012 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2013 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2014 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
| 2015 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.0% |
| 2016 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2017 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2018 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.9% |
| 2019 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2020 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2021 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2022 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2023 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2024 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.9% |
| 2025 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
Cambodia compared with similar countries
- Cambodia's -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Cambodia's -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.9259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cambodia
More reference data data for Cambodia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6712 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8836 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 17.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cambodia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cambodia was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Cambodia?
- The highest recorded value was -0.8568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Cambodia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- How does Cambodia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cambodia ranks 193rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Cambodia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cambodia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.