Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China
China: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in China, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
China recorded -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.2% on the previous year and down 10.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in China peaked at -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
China ranks 194th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | -1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2002 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2003 | -1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2004 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.7% |
| 2005 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2006 | -1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2007 | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2008 | -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2009 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2010 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2011 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2012 | -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2013 | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
| 2014 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2015 | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2016 | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2017 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2018 | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2019 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2020 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2021 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2022 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2023 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2024 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2025 | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 31.7× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- China's -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near China
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in China?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in China was -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does China rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- China ranks 194th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.