Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Cuba
Cuba: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2020. ▼ Falling
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Cuba, 2001–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Cuba is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2020.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and down 52.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Cuba peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Cuba ranks 118th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Cuba, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +86.5% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.5% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +93.3% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -56.9% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.2% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -29.4% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -47.9% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +13.7% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +202.2% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -66.4% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 33% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 21% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +202.2% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 115 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 116 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 117 Austria 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 119 Japan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 120 India 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 121 Curacao 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Cuba?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Cuba was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Cuba rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 118th out of 173 countries with data for 2020.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 52.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.