Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2024.

What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Cuba

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cuba rank

118th

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank

116th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Cuba
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Cuba ranks 118th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 116th of 173 countries.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
How do Cuba and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Cuba ranks 118th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 116th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Cuba vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.