Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Saint Kitts and Nevis is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 69.3% on the previous year and down 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Saint Kitts and Nevis peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2015.
That places Saint Kitts and Nevis 115th out of 173 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -63.0% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +198.5% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -82.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +57.4% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -33.8% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -45.3% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +82.9% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +97.8% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -54.2% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -55.0% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +84.7% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -85.2% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -75.1% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +42.6% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +122.2% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +166.5% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +227.4% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -58.7% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -72.7% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +69.3% |
Saint Kitts and Nevis compared with similar countries
- Saint Kitts and Nevis's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 83% of the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Saint Kitts and Nevis's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 24% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Saint Kitts and Nevis
More reference data data for Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0022 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0041 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0064 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0064 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0041 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.019 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0311 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Saint Kitts and Nevis was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2003.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2015.
- How does Saint Kitts and Nevis rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 115th out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Saint Kitts and Nevis data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.