Cuba vs India: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2020
India
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba rank
118th
India rank
120th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- India
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in India, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times India's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 118th and India ranks 120th of 173 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Cuba or India?
- Cuba, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in India as of 2020.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Cuba and India?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and India?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and India rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 118th and India ranks 120th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.