Austria vs Cuba: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Austria
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Austria rank
117th
Cuba rank
118th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Austria
- Cuba
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Austria ranks 117th and Cuba ranks 118th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Austria or Cuba?
- Austria, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Austria and Cuba?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cuba?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Cuba rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Austria ranks 117th and Cuba ranks 118th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.