Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Denmark

Denmark: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) was 745 DB06-15 methodology in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
745 DB06-15 methodology
Change on year
down 1.6%
World rank
160th
of 184 countries
All-time high
849.88 DB06-15 methodology
in 2008
All-time low
704.51 DB06-15 methodology
in 2007
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Denmark, 2005–2014

02004006008002005200920142005: 740.2 DB06-15 methodology2006: 719.5 DB06-15 methodology2007: 704.5 DB06-15 methodology2008: 849.9 DB06-15 methodology2009: 815.4 DB06-15 methodology2010: 810 DB06-15 methodology2011: 777.8 DB06-15 methodology2012: 773 DB06-15 methodology2013: 757.4 DB06-15 methodology2014: 745 DB06-15 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-15 methodology.

Analysis

In 2014, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Denmark stood at 745 DB06-15 methodology.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.6% on the previous year and up 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Denmark peaked at 849.88 DB06-15 methodology in 2008 and was at its lowest, 704.51 DB06-15 methodology, in 2007.

That places Denmark 160th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Denmark, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology) in Denmark, 2005 to 2014.
Year DB06-15 methodology Change
2005 740.18 DB06-15 methodology —
2006 719.48 DB06-15 methodology -2.8%
2007 704.51 DB06-15 methodology -2.1%
2008 849.88 DB06-15 methodology +20.6%
2009 815.37 DB06-15 methodology -4.1%
2010 809.99 DB06-15 methodology -0.7%
2011 777.77 DB06-15 methodology -4.0%
2012 773.01 DB06-15 methodology -0.6%
2013 757.41 DB06-15 methodology -2.0%
2014 745 DB06-15 methodology -1.6%

Denmark compared with similar countries

  • Denmark's 745 DB06-15 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 1,050 DB06-15 methodology, 71% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Denmark's 745 DB06-15 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1,225 DB06-15 methodology, 61% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 765.88 DB06-15 methodology 704.51 DB06-15 methodology 849.88 DB06-15 methodology 5
2010s 772.64 DB06-15 methodology 745 DB06-15 methodology 809.99 DB06-15 methodology 5

Countries ranked near Denmark

  1. 157 Brunei 770 DB06-15 methodology compare
  2. 158 Thailand 760 DB06-15 methodology compare
  3. 159 Fiji 753 DB06-15 methodology compare
  4. 160 Gambia 745 DB06-15 methodology compare
  5. 162 Sweden 735 DB06-15 methodology compare
  6. 163 Albania 730 DB06-15 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Denmark

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Denmark?
Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Denmark was 745 DB06-15 methodology in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) recorded in Denmark?
The highest recorded value was 849.88 DB06-15 methodology in 2008.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) recorded in Denmark?
The lowest recorded value was 704.51 DB06-15 methodology in 2007.
How does Denmark rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Denmark ranks 160th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) rising or falling in Denmark?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Denmark data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Denmark. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/denmark/">Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Denmark</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.