Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Uruguay
Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 80.97 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Uruguay, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Uruguay is 80.97, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and up 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Uruguay peaked at 80.97 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 69.58, in 2005.
That places Uruguay 95th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 69.58 | — |
| 2006 | 69.83 | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 72.08 | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 71.05 | -1.4% |
| 2009 | 73.68 | +3.7% |
| 2010 | 75.21 | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 76.66 | +1.9% |
| 2012 | 76.59 | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 79.01 | +3.2% |
| 2014 | 80.97 | +2.5% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 80.97 is below the median for high income countries, which is 87.9, 92% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 80.97 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 1.0× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.24 | 69.58 | 73.68 | 5 |
| 2010s | 77.69 | 75.21 | 80.97 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 92 Luxembourg 81.33 compare
- 93 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 81.24 compare
- 93 Palestine 81.24 compare
- 95 Switzerland 80.97 compare
- 95 Vanuatu 80.97 compare
- 98 France 80.88 compare
- 98 Guatemala 80.88 compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Uruguay?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Uruguay was 80.97 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 80.97 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 69.58 in 2005.
- How does Uruguay rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Uruguay ranks 95th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.