France vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

France
80.88
in 2014
Uruguay
80.97
in 2014
France rank
97th
Uruguay rank
94th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • France
  • Uruguay
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 80.97 against 80.88 in France, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.

France ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 94th of 181 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 80.26 71.24 9.02 France
2010s 80.41 77.69 2.72 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, France or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 80.97 against 80.88 in France as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between France and Uruguay?
0.09, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Uruguay?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do France and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
France ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.