Uruguay vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Uruguay
80.97
in 2014
Vanuatu
80.97
in 2014
Uruguay rank
94th
Vanuatu rank
94th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Uruguay
  • Vanuatu
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 80.97 against 80.97 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 94th and Vanuatu ranks 94th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 71.24 68.75 2.49 Uruguay
2010s 77.69 80.94 3.25 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Uruguay or Vanuatu?
Uruguay, at 80.97 against 80.97 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Uruguay and Vanuatu?
0, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Vanuatu?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Uruguay and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Uruguay ranks 94th and Vanuatu ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.