Guatemala vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Guatemala
80.88
in 2014
Uruguay
80.97
in 2014
Guatemala rank
97th
Uruguay rank
94th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Guatemala
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 80.97 against 80.88 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.
Guatemala ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.26 | 71.24 | 4.99 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 79.67 | 77.69 | 1.98 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Guatemala or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 80.97 against 80.88 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 0.09, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Guatemala ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 94th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.