Luxembourg vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Luxembourg
81.33
in 2014
Uruguay
80.97
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
92nd
Uruguay rank
95th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Luxembourg
- Uruguay
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 81.33 against 80.97 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.36.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 95th of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.97 | 71.66 | 5.31 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 79.24 | 77.69 | 1.55 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Luxembourg or Uruguay?
- Luxembourg, at 81.33 against 80.97 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Luxembourg and Uruguay?
- 0.36, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Luxembourg and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 95th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.