Burundi vs Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Burundi
28.06
in 2014
Mali
25.93
in 2014
Burundi rank
168th
Mali rank
170th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Burundi
  • Mali
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 28.06 against 25.93 in Mali, a difference of 2.13.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mali ahead.

Burundi ranks 168th and Mali ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 0 36.14 36.14 Mali
2010s 9.11 35.87 26.76 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Burundi or Mali?
Burundi, at 28.06 against 25.93 in Mali as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Burundi and Mali?
2.13, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Mali?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Burundi and Mali rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Burundi ranks 168th and Mali ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.