Bangladesh vs Ecuador: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bangladesh
79.64
in 2014
Ecuador
79.55
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
105th
Ecuador rank
106th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bangladesh
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 79.64 against 79.55 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Ecuador ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.21 | 74.45 | 4.24 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 77.66 | 78.1 | 0.4397 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bangladesh or Ecuador?
- Bangladesh, at 79.64 against 79.55 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bangladesh and Ecuador?
- 0.09, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ecuador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Ecuador rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bangladesh ranks 105th and Ecuador ranks 106th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.