Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Uganda?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Uganda data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uganda

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uganda
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 57.77 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

57.77

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

159th

of 188 countries

All-time high

57.77

in 2014

All-time low

57.77

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uganda, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Uganda recorded 57.77 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Uganda ranks 159th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Uganda

156 United Arab Emirates 59.52 compare
157 Uruguay 59.29 compare
158 Qatar 58.57 compare
160 Somalia 57.14 compare
161 Congo 55.71 compare
162 Kuwait 52.6 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Uganda

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.95 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4214 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.13 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.29 (2050)

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Uganda?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Uganda was 57.77 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Uganda?: The highest recorded value was 57.77 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Uganda?: The lowest recorded value was 57.77 in 2014.
How does Uganda rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Uganda ranks 159th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Uganda?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uganda data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.