Congo vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Congo
55.71
in 2019
Uganda
57.77
in 2019
Congo rank
161st
Uganda rank
159th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Congo
  • Uganda
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 57.77 against 55.71 in Congo, a difference of 2.06.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 159th of 188 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Congo or Uganda?
Uganda, at 57.77 against 55.71 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Congo and Uganda?
2.06, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Congo ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.