Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Somalia

Somalia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 57.14 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
57.14
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
163rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
57.14
in 2015
All-time low
57.14
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Somalia, 2015–2019

02040602015201720192015: 57.12016: 57.12017: 57.12018: 57.12019: 57.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Somalia is 57.14, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

That places Somalia 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Somalia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Somalia, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 57.14 —
2016 57.14 +0.0%
2017 57.14 +0.0%
2018 57.14 +0.0%
2019 57.14 +0.0%

Somalia compared with similar countries

  • Somalia's 57.14 is above the median for low income countries, which is 47.35, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Somalia's 57.14 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.32, 80% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Somalia

  1. 160 Uruguay 59.29 compare
  2. 161 Qatar 58.57 compare
  3. 162 Uganda 57.77 compare
  4. 164 Congo 55.71 compare
  5. 165 Kuwait 52.6 compare
  6. 166 South Sudan 50 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Somalia

All data for Somalia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Somalia?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Somalia was 57.14 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Somalia?
The highest recorded value was 57.14 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Somalia?
The lowest recorded value was 57.14 in 2015.
How does Somalia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Somalia ranks 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Somalia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Somalia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/somalia-fed-rep/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Somalia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.