Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Qatar?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Qatar data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Qatar: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 58.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

58.57

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

158th

of 188 countries

All-time high

58.57

in 2014

All-time low

58.57

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Qatar recorded 58.57 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Qatar 158th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Qatar

155 Sri Lanka 59.6 compare
156 United Arab Emirates 59.52 compare
157 Uruguay 59.29 compare
159 Uganda 57.77 compare
160 Somalia 57.14 compare
161 Congo 55.71 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Qatar

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 66.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2166 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 2.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 8.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 74.18 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0397 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 9.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 5.28 (2050)

All data for Qatar →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Qatar?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Qatar was 58.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Qatar?: The highest recorded value was 58.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Qatar?: The lowest recorded value was 58.57 in 2014.
How does Qatar rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Qatar ranks 158th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Qatar?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Qatar data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.