Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Kuwait?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Kuwait data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kuwait

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kuwait
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kuwait: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 52.6 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

52.6

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

162nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

52.6

in 2014

All-time low

52.6

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kuwait, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Kuwait recorded 52.6 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Kuwait 162nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Kuwait

159 Uganda 57.77 compare
160 Somalia 57.14 compare
161 Congo 55.71 compare
163 South Sudan 50 compare
164 Bangladesh 47.14 compare
165 Tanzania 46.43 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kuwait

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.385 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2165 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 131.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 1.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.24 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0876 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 405.04 (2050)

All data for Kuwait →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Kuwait?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Kuwait was 52.6 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Kuwait?: The highest recorded value was 52.6 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Kuwait?: The lowest recorded value was 52.6 in 2014.
How does Kuwait rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Kuwait ranks 162nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Kuwait?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kuwait data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.