Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Central African Republic

Central African Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 28.57 in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
28.57
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
175th
of 190 countries
All-time high
28.57
in 2014
All-time low
28.57
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Central African Republic, 2014–2019

01020302014201620192014: 28.62015: 28.62016: 28.62017: 28.62018: 28.62019: 28.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Central African Republic is 28.57, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Central African Republic 175th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Central African Republic

  1. 172 Sudan 40 compare
  2. 173 Angola 34.29 compare
  3. 174 Ghana 32.29 compare
  4. 175 Chad 28.57 compare
  5. 175 Iraq 28.57 compare
  6. 178 Senegal 22.14 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Central African Republic

All data for Central African Republic β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Central African Republic?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Central African Republic was 28.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Central African Republic?
The highest recorded value was 28.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Central African Republic?
The lowest recorded value was 28.57 in 2014.
How does Central African Republic rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Central African Republic ranks 175th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Central African Republic?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Central African Republic. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/central-african-republic/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Central African Republic</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.