Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Chad?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Chad data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chad

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chad
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Chad: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 28.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

28.57

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

173rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

28.57

in 2014

All-time low

28.57

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chad, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Chad is 28.57, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Chad ranks 173rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Chad

170 Sudan 40 compare
171 Angola 34.29 compare
172 Ghana 32.29 compare
173 Central African Republic 28.57 compare
173 Iraq 28.57 compare
176 Senegal 22.14 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Chad

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1797 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 1,294 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 48.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 58.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9785 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0281 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 273.47 (2050)

All data for Chad →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Chad?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Chad was 28.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Chad?: The highest recorded value was 28.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Chad?: The lowest recorded value was 28.57 in 2014.
How does Chad rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Chad ranks 173rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Chad?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chad data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.