Angola vs Central African Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Angola
34.29
in 2019
Central African Republic
28.57
in 2019
Angola rank
174th
Central African Republic rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Angola
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Angola currently reports 34.29 against 28.57 in Central African Republic, a difference of 5.72.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 174th and Central African Republic ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Angola or Central African Republic?
- Angola, at 34.29 against 28.57 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Angola and Central African Republic?
- 5.72, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Central African Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Central African Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Angola ranks 174th and Central African Republic ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.