Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Sudan

Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 40 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
40
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
173rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
40
in 2014
All-time low
40
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Sudan, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 402015: 402016: 402017: 402018: 402019: 40

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Sudan is 40, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Sudan ranks 173rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 40 —
2015 40 +0.0%
2016 40 +0.0%
2017 40 +0.0%
2018 40 +0.0%
2019 40 +0.0%

Sudan compared with similar countries

  • Sudan's 40 is below the median for low income countries, which is 47.35, 84% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Sudan's 40 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.32, 56% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 170 Algeria 42.89 compare
  2. 171 Mauritania 42.86 compare
  3. 172 Liberia 42.14 compare
  4. 174 Angola 34.29 compare
  5. 175 Ghana 32.29 compare
  6. 176 Central African Republic 28.57 compare
  7. 176 Chad 28.57 compare
  8. 176 Iraq 28.57 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Sudan?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Sudan was 40 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 40 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2014.
How does Sudan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Sudan ranks 173rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/sudan/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.