How does Ghana rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?

Ghana ranks 172nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Ghana?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Ghana data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ghana

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ghana
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Ghana: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 32.29 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

32.29

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

172nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

32.29

in 2014

All-time low

32.29

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ghana, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Ghana stood at 32.29. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Ghana ranks 172nd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Ghana

169 Liberia 42.14 compare
170 Sudan 40 compare
171 Angola 34.29 compare
173 Chad 28.57 compare
173 Iraq 28.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Ghana

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2805 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.89 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1989 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9405 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9478 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.64 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)

All data for Ghana →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Ghana?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Ghana was 32.29 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Ghana?: The highest recorded value was 32.29 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Ghana?: The lowest recorded value was 32.29 in 2014.
How does Ghana rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Ghana ranks 172nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Ghana?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ghana data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.