Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Ghana

Ghana: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 32.29 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
32.29
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
175th
of 191 countries
All-time high
32.29
in 2014
All-time low
32.29
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Ghana, 2014–2019

01020302014201620192014: 32.32015: 32.32016: 32.32017: 32.32018: 32.32019: 32.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Ghana stood at 32.29. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Ghana ranks 175th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Ghana, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ghana, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 32.29 —
2015 32.29 +0.0%
2016 32.29 +0.0%
2017 32.29 +0.0%
2018 32.29 +0.0%
2019 32.29 +0.0%

Ghana compared with similar countries

  • Ghana's 32.29 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.37, 41% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Ghana's 32.29 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.32, 45% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Ghana

  1. 172 Liberia 42.14 compare
  2. 173 Sudan 40 compare
  3. 174 Angola 34.29 compare
  4. 176 Central African Republic 28.57 compare
  5. 176 Chad 28.57 compare
  6. 176 Iraq 28.57 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Ghana

All data for Ghana →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Ghana?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Ghana was 32.29 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Ghana?
The highest recorded value was 32.29 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Ghana?
The lowest recorded value was 32.29 in 2014.
How does Ghana rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Ghana ranks 175th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Ghana?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ghana data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Ghana. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ghana/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Ghana</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.