Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Japan?

Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Japan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Japan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Japan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 74.3 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

74.3

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

75th

of 188 countries

All-time high

75.01

in 2014

All-time low

74.3

in 2018

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Japan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Japan recorded 74.3 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of down 1.0% over ten years.

Japan ranks 75th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Japan

72 Egypt 75.66 compare
73 Burkina Faso 75.38 compare
74 Panama 74.53 compare
76 Uzbekistan 73.78 compare
77 Oman 73.68 compare
78 Central African Republic 73.58 compare
78 United Kingdom 73.58 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Japan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.49 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.52 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0529 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3629 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,290 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.74 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1,056 (2050)

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Japan?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Japan was 74.3 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Japan?: The highest recorded value was 75.01 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Japan?: The lowest recorded value was 74.3 in 2018.
How does Japan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Japan ranks 75th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Japan?: Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.