Japan vs Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16
Japan
74.3
in 2019
Oman
73.68
in 2019
Japan rank
75th
Oman rank
77th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time
- Japan
- Oman
How they compare
Japan currently reports 74.3 against 73.68 in Oman, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Oman ahead.
Japan ranks 75th and Oman ranks 77th of 188 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Japan or Oman?
- Japan, at 74.3 against 73.68 in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Japan and Oman?
- 0.62, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Oman?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
- Japan ranks 75th and Oman ranks 77th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.