Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Panama?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Panama data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Panama

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Panama
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 74.53 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

74.53

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

74th

of 188 countries

All-time high

74.53

in 2014

All-time low

74.53

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Panama, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Panama recorded 74.53 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Panama 74th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Panama

71 China 75.83 compare
72 Egypt, Arab Rep. 75.66 compare
73 Burkina Faso 75.38 compare
75 Japan 74.3 compare
76 Uzbekistan 73.78 compare
77 Oman 73.68 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Panama

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1446 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6179 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.9793 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0285 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.9793 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4849 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2267 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1553 (2050)

All data for Panama →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Panama?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Panama was 74.53 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Panama?: The highest recorded value was 74.53 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Panama?: The lowest recorded value was 74.53 in 2014.
How does Panama rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Panama ranks 74th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Panama?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Panama data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.