Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Egypt?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Egypt data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Egypt

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Egypt
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 75.66 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

75.66

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

72nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

75.66

in 2014

All-time low

75.66

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Egypt, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Egypt recorded 75.66 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Egypt 72nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Egypt

69 Mali 77.2 compare
70 Malawi 77.08 compare
71 China 75.83 compare
73 Burkina Faso 75.38 compare
74 Panama 74.53 compare
75 Japan 74.3 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Egypt

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Egypt?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Egypt was 75.66 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Egypt?: The highest recorded value was 75.66 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Egypt?: The lowest recorded value was 75.66 in 2014.
How does Egypt rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Egypt ranks 72nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Egypt?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Egypt data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.