Japan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Japan
74.3
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
73.58
in 2019
Japan rank
77th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
80th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Japan
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Japan currently reports 74.3 against 73.58 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.72.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 77th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 80th of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Japan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Japan, at 74.3 against 73.58 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0.72, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Japan ranks 77th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 80th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.