Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ethiopia
Ethiopia: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -1.01 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ethiopia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Ethiopia recorded -1.01 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.1% on the previous year and down 693.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ethiopia peaked at 0.224 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -2.07, in 1936.
That places Ethiopia 144th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ethiopia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.95 | — |
| 1790 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.84 | -5.5% |
| 1918 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.07 | +12.6% |
| 1937 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.88 | -9.1% |
| 1942 | -1.72 | -8.8% |
| 1943 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.3 | -24.4% |
| 1971 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.907 | -30.2% |
| 1975 | -1.44 | +58.9% |
| 1976 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.15 | -20.5% |
| 1981 | -0.834 | -27.2% |
| 1982 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.834 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.052 | -106.2% |
| 1992 | -0.2 | -484.6% |
| 1993 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.117 | -41.5% |
| 2011 | -0.117 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.117 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.057 | -51.3% |
| 2014 | -0.057 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.128 | +124.6% |
| 2016 | -0.128 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.398 | +210.9% |
| 2018 | 0.224 | -156.3% |
| 2019 | -0.071 | -131.7% |
| 2020 | -0.02 | -71.8% |
| 2021 | -0.557 | +2685.0% |
| 2022 | -0.884 | +58.7% |
| 2023 | -1.1 | +24.1% |
| 2024 | -1.12 | +1.7% |
| 2025 | -1.01 | -9.1% |
Ethiopia compared with similar countries
- Ethiopia's -1.01 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.21, 84% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Ethiopia's -1.01 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.0345, 29.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.92 | -1.95 | -1.84 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.84 | -1.84 | -1.84 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.93 | -2.07 | -1.84 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.77 | -2.07 | -1.72 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.72 | -1.72 | -1.72 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.72 | -1.72 | -1.72 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.33 | -1.44 | -0.907 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.8651 | -1.15 | -0.834 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.2382 | -0.834 | 0.052 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.0966 | -0.398 | 0.224 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7815 | -1.12 | -0.02 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ethiopia
More reference data data for Ethiopia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6564 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 25.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 100.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 121.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.47 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ethiopia?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ethiopia was -1.01 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Ethiopia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.224 in 2018.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Ethiopia?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.07 in 1936.
- How does Ethiopia rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Ethiopia ranks 144th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Ethiopia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 693.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ethiopia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.