Ethiopia vs Vatican: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Ethiopia
-1.01
in 2025
Vatican
-1.03
in 1870
Ethiopia rank
144th
Vatican rank
145th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Ethiopia
- Vatican
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports -1.01 against -1.03 in Vatican, a difference of 0.02.
Across all 78 years both countries report, Vatican has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 144th and Vatican ranks 145th of 176 countries.
Vatican has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Vatican | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.95 | -1.07 | 0.883 | Vatican |
| 1790s | -1.95 | -1.07 | 0.883 | Vatican |
| 1800s | -1.95 | -1.07 | 0.883 | Vatican |
| 1810s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1820s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1830s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1840s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1850s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1860s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
| 1870s | -1.95 | -1.03 | 0.919 | Vatican |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Ethiopia or Vatican?
- Ethiopia, at -1.01 against -1.03 in Vatican as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Ethiopia and Vatican?
- 0.02, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Vatican?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 1870.
- How do Ethiopia and Vatican rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Ethiopia ranks 144th and Vatican ranks 145th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.