Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Egypt
Egypt: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.992 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Egypt, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Egypt recorded -0.992 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 23.9% on the previous year and down 33.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Egypt peaked at 1.08 in 1789 and was at its lowest, -1.53, in 2022.
That places Egypt 143rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Egypt, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 1.08 | — |
| 1790 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 1.08 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.479 | -55.7% |
| 1861 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.479 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.758 | +58.2% |
| 1950 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.302 | -60.2% |
| 1954 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.302 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.165 | -154.6% |
| 1961 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.165 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.628 | +280.6% |
| 1969 | -0.628 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.173 | -72.5% |
| 1971 | -0.173 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.173 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.173 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.672 | +288.4% |
| 1975 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.672 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.096 | -114.3% |
| 1987 | -0.67 | -797.9% |
| 1988 | -0.67 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.67 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.303 | -54.8% |
| 1991 | -0.303 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.303 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.303 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -1.24 | +310.6% |
| 1995 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.17 | -5.6% |
| 2002 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.21 | +2.9% |
| 2008 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.29 | +6.6% |
| 2013 | -1.46 | +13.0% |
| 2014 | -1.24 | -14.8% |
| 2015 | -0.743 | -40.1% |
| 2016 | -0.743 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -1.26 | +70.1% |
| 2018 | -1.19 | -6.2% |
| 2019 | -1.14 | -3.9% |
| 2020 | -1.14 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -1.43 | +25.6% |
| 2022 | -1.53 | +6.8% |
| 2023 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.3 | -14.7% |
| 2025 | -0.992 | -23.9% |
Egypt compared with similar countries
- Egypt's -0.992 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 5.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Egypt's -0.992 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.364, 2.7× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1 |
| 1790s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1800s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1810s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1820s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1830s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1840s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.479 | 0.479 | 0.479 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5069 | 0.479 | 0.758 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.4388 | 0.302 | 0.758 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.2576 | -0.628 | -0.165 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.4724 | -0.672 | -0.173 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.5946 | -0.672 | 0.096 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.8676 | -1.24 | -0.303 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.19 | -1.24 | -1.17 | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.15 | -1.46 | -0.743 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.32 | -1.53 | -0.992 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
More reference data data for Egypt
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Egypt?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Egypt was -0.992 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 1.08 in 1789.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.53 in 2022.
- How does Egypt rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Egypt ranks 143rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.