Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.936 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.936
Change on year
up 8.1%
World rank
141st
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.39
in 1870
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
213
1813–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Azerbaijan, 1813–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Azerbaijan recorded -0.936 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
That represents a change of up 8.1% on the previous year and up 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Azerbaijan peaked at 1.39 in 1870 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
That places Azerbaijan 141st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1813 | -1.87 | — |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.582 | -68.8% |
| 1856 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.377 | -164.8% |
| 1866 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.39 | +269.0% |
| 1871 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.383 | -72.5% |
| 1879 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.308 | -180.4% |
| 1882 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.448 | +45.5% |
| 1906 | -0.322 | -28.1% |
| 1907 | -0.246 | -23.6% |
| 1908 | -0.108 | -56.1% |
| 1909 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.178 | +64.8% |
| 1914 | -0.178 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.304 | +70.8% |
| 1916 | -0.304 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.096 | -68.4% |
| 1918 | -1.8 | +1780.2% |
| 1919 | -2.26 | +25.1% |
| 1920 | -2.2 | -2.4% |
| 1921 | -2.2 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.73 | -21.3% |
| 1923 | -1.32 | -23.8% |
| 1924 | -1.53 | +15.7% |
| 1925 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.46 | -4.7% |
| 1929 | -1.46 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | +13.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.86 | +12.6% |
| 1935 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -10.5% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.337 | -68.9% |
| 1991 | -0.337 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.188 | -155.8% |
| 1993 | 0.188 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | -1.11 | -689.4% |
| 1995 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.27 | +14.8% |
| 2011 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.12 | -11.9% |
| 2014 | -1.12 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.12 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -1.1 | -1.6% |
| 2017 | -1.08 | -2.1% |
| 2018 | -1.24 | +14.8% |
| 2019 | -1.2 | -2.9% |
| 2020 | -1.18 | -1.9% |
| 2021 | -1.3 | +10.6% |
| 2022 | -1.16 | -11.3% |
| 2023 | -0.928 | -19.8% |
| 2024 | -1.02 | +9.8% |
| 2025 | -0.936 | -8.1% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's -0.936 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's -0.936 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 7 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.23 | -1.87 | -0.582 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1025 | -0.582 | 0.377 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.19 | 0.383 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.2389 | -0.308 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.308 | -0.308 | -0.308 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.2772 | -0.448 | -0.108 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.5447 | -2.26 | -0.096 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.65 | -2.2 | -1.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.77 | -1.86 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.6946 | -1.11 | 0.188 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.11 | -1.11 | -1.11 | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.18 | -1.27 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.09 | -1.3 | -0.928 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
More reference data data for Azerbaijan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Azerbaijan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Azerbaijan was -0.936 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 in 1870.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 141st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 213 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.