Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ecuador
Ecuador: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.941 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.941
Change on year
down 2,140.5%
World rank
142nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.491
in 2022
All-time low
-2.56
in 1830
Years of data
196
1830–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ecuador, 1830–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ecuador stood at -0.941.
That represents a change of down 2,140.5% on the previous year and down 299.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ecuador peaked at 0.491 in 2022 and was at its lowest, -2.56, in 1830.
That places Ecuador 142nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | -2.56 | — |
| 1831 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.56 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.12 | -16.9% |
| 1846 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.55 | +20.0% |
| 1861 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -2.15 | -15.9% |
| 1867 | -2.15 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -2.15 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -2.55 | +18.8% |
| 1870 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.55 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.92 | -24.8% |
| 1891 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.71 | -10.7% |
| 1907 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.49 | -12.9% |
| 1913 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.49 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -2.14 | +43.5% |
| 1923 | -1.8 | -15.7% |
| 1924 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.62 | -9.9% |
| 1927 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.93 | +18.9% |
| 1936 | -1.93 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.93 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.63 | -15.8% |
| 1939 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.91 | +17.4% |
| 1947 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.2 | -37.2% |
| 1949 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.9 | +58.0% |
| 1964 | -1.9 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.9 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.62 | -14.2% |
| 1967 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.62 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.44 | -11.7% |
| 1973 | -1.68 | +17.1% |
| 1974 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.45 | -13.7% |
| 1978 | -1.45 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.607 | -58.2% |
| 1980 | -0.314 | -48.3% |
| 1981 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.5 | +59.2% |
| 1985 | -0.5 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.5 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.5 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.316 | -36.8% |
| 1989 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.599 | +89.6% |
| 1997 | -0.599 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.04 | -106.7% |
| 1999 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.2 | +400.0% |
| 2008 | 0.285 | +42.5% |
| 2009 | 0.463 | +62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.471 | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.415 | -11.9% |
| 2018 | 0.255 | -38.6% |
| 2019 | 0.426 | +67.1% |
| 2020 | 0.426 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.426 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.491 | +15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.098 | -80.0% |
| 2024 | -0.042 | -142.9% |
| 2025 | -0.941 | +2140.5% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.941 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.941 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | -2.56 | -2.56 | -2.56 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.34 | -2.56 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.43 | -2.55 | -2.15 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.55 | -2.55 | -2.55 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.55 | -2.55 | -2.55 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.92 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.83 | -1.92 | -1.71 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.54 | -1.71 | -1.49 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.7 | -2.14 | -1.49 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.72 | -1.93 | -1.62 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.6 | -1.91 | -1.2 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.2 | -1.2 | -1.2 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.58 | -1.9 | -1.2 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.49 | -1.68 | -0.607 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3888 | -0.5 | -0.314 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.3014 | -0.599 | 0.04 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1228 | 0.04 | 0.463 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4393 | 0.255 | 0.471 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0763 | -0.941 | 0.491 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ecuador?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Ecuador was -0.941 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.491 in 2022.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.56 in 1830.
- How does Ecuador rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Ecuador ranks 142nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 299.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 196 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.