Statizoid

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bhutan

Bhutan: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 DB15-20 methodology
World rank
133rd
of 188 countries
All-time high
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bhutan, 2003–2019

00.20.40.60.812003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 0 DB15-20 methodology2009: 0 DB15-20 methodology2010: 0 DB15-20 methodology2011: 0 DB15-20 methodology2012: 0 DB15-20 methodology2013: 0 DB15-20 methodology2014: 0 DB15-20 methodology2015: 0 DB15-20 methodology2016: 0 DB15-20 methodology2017: 0 DB15-20 methodology2018: 0 DB15-20 methodology2019: 0 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Bhutan recorded 0 DB15-20 methodology for reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bhutan peaked at 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Bhutan 133rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 133 Bangladesh 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 133 India 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 133 Nigeria 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 133 Angola 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 133 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 133 Bahamas 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 133 Belize 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 133 Botswana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 133 Costa Rica 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 133 Dominica 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 133 Ecuador 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 133 El Salvador 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 133 Eritrea 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 133 Eswatini 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 133 Ethiopia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 133 Fiji 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 133 Georgia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 133 Ghana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 133 Guatemala 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 133 Guyana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 133 Haiti 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 133 Honduras 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 133 Hong Kong 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 133 Iran 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 133 Iraq 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 133 Kiribati 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 133 Kuwait 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 133 Lebanon 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 133 Lesotho 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 133 Libya 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 133 Maldives 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 133 Malta 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 133 Marshall Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 133 Mauritania 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 133 Myanmar 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 133 Namibia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 133 Nicaragua 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 133 Oman 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 133 Palau 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 133 Papua New Guinea 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 133 Qatar 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 133 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 133 Sierra Leone 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 133 Solomon Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 133 Somalia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 133 Saint Lucia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  47. 133 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  48. 133 Syria 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  49. 133 Tonga 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  50. 133 Tunisia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  51. 133 Vanuatu 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  52. 133 Venezuela 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  53. 133 Palestine 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  54. 133 Yemen 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  55. 133 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bhutan?
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bhutan was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Bhutan rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Bhutan ranks 133rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.