Statizoid

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China)

Hong Kong (China): Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 DB15-20 methodology
World rank
135th
of 190 countries
All-time high
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China), 2003–2019

00.20.40.60.812003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 0 DB15-20 methodology2009: 0 DB15-20 methodology2010: 0 DB15-20 methodology2011: 0 DB15-20 methodology2012: 0 DB15-20 methodology2013: 0 DB15-20 methodology2014: 0 DB15-20 methodology2015: 0 DB15-20 methodology2016: 0 DB15-20 methodology2017: 0 DB15-20 methodology2018: 0 DB15-20 methodology2019: 0 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China) is 0 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China) peaked at 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Hong Kong (China) 135th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Hong Kong (China)

  1. 135 Bangladesh 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 135 India 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 135 Nigeria 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 135 Angola 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 135 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 135 Bahamas 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 135 Belize 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 135 Bhutan 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 135 Botswana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 135 Costa Rica 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 135 Dominica 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 135 Ecuador 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 135 El Salvador 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 135 Eritrea 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 135 Eswatini 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 135 Ethiopia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 135 Fiji 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 135 Georgia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 135 Ghana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 135 Guatemala 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 135 Guyana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 135 Haiti 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 135 Honduras 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 135 Iran 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 135 Iraq 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 135 Kiribati 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 135 Kuwait 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 135 Lebanon 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 135 Lesotho 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 135 Libya 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 135 Maldives 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 135 Malta 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 135 Marshall Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 135 Mauritania 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 135 Myanmar 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 135 Namibia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 135 Nicaragua 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 135 Oman 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 135 Palau 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 135 Papua New Guinea 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 135 Qatar 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 135 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 135 Sierra Leone 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 135 Solomon Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 135 Somalia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 135 Saint Lucia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  47. 135 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  48. 135 Syria 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  49. 135 Tonga 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  50. 135 Tunisia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  51. 135 Vanuatu 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  52. 135 Venezuela 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  53. 135 Palestine 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  54. 135 Yemen 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
  55. 135 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Hong Kong (China)

All data for Hong Kong (China) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China)?
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China) was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Hong Kong (China)?
The highest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Hong Kong (China)?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Hong Kong (China) rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Hong Kong (China) ranks 135th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Hong Kong (China) data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/">Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Hong Kong (China)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.