Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology) by country

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each...

Countries reporting
188
Highest
3 DB15-20 methodology
Albania
Lowest
0 DB15-20 methodology
Zambia
Median
0.5 DB15-20 methodology
Years covered
17
2003–2019
Data points
3,230

What the numbers show

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology) is currently reported for 188 countries. The highest value is 3 DB15-20 methodology in Albania; the lowest is 0 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia.

The median across all reporting countries is 0.5 DB15-20 methodology, and the mean is 0.9734 DB15-20 methodology.

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Albania 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Micronesia (country) 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
1 Croatia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Italy 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
1 Japan 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
1 South Korea 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
1 Montenegro 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
1 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% rising
1 Poland 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% rising
1 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
1 Rwanda 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Serbia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% volatile
1 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Thailand 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% rising
1 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
23 Bulgaria 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
23 China 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
23 Finland 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
23 Greece 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
23 Latvia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
23 Moldova 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
23 Romania 2.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
30 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
30 United Arab Emirates 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
30 Argentina 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
30 Armenia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
30 Bahrain 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
30 Brazil 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
30 Chile 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
30 Spain 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
30 Estonia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
30 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
30 Kyrgyzstan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
30 Nepal 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
30 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
30 Slovenia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
30 Vietnam 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% volatile
45 Azerbaijan 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
45 Brunei 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
45 Cyprus 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
45 Ireland 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
45 Kazakhstan 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
45 Morocco 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
45 Mexico 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
45 Mozambique 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
45 Pakistan 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
45 Turkey 1.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
55 Austria 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Burundi 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
55 Belgium 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Bolivia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Barbados 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Canada 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Switzerland 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Cape Verde 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Denmark 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Algeria 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Egypt 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 France 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
55 United Kingdom 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Gambia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Grenada 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Iceland 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
55 Jamaica 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Netherlands 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Norway 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Paraguay 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Russia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 San Marino 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
55 Suriname 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Sweden 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 East Timor 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Trinidad and Tobago 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Tanzania 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Uruguay 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
55 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
55 Samoa 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
86 Australia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Benin 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Burkina Faso 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Belarus 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Central African Republic 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Cote d'Ivoire 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Cameroon 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Congo 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Colombia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Comoros 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Dominican Republic 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Gabon 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Guinea 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Guinea-Bissau 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Equatorial Guinea 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Hungary 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Indonesia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Jordan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Laos 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Liberia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
86 Lithuania 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Luxembourg 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Madagascar 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
86 Mali 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Mongolia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Mauritius 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
86 Malawi 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Malaysia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Niger 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 New Zealand 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
86 Panama 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Peru 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Senegal 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Singapore 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 South Sudan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Seychelles 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Chad 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Togo 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Tajikistan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
86 Uganda 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Ukraine 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Uzbekistan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
86 South Africa 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
86 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
86 Taiwan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
133 Angola 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Bangladesh 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Bahamas 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Belize 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Bhutan 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Botswana 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Costa Rica 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Dominica 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Ecuador 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Eritrea 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Ethiopia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Fiji 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Georgia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Ghana 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Guatemala 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Guyana 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Hong Kong 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Honduras 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Haiti 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 India 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
133 Iran 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Iraq 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Kiribati 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Kuwait 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Lebanon 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Libya 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Saint Lucia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Lesotho 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Maldives 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Marshall Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Malta 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Myanmar 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Mauritania 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Namibia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Nigeria 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Nicaragua 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Oman 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Palau 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Papua New Guinea 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Palestine 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Qatar 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Solomon Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Sierra Leone 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 El Salvador 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Somalia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Eswatini 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Syria 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Tonga 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Tunisia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Venezuela 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Vanuatu 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Yemen 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
133 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.